CRJ 306-week 2 discussion 1
Distinguish between the terms actus reus and mens rea. How are they significant in criminal law? To what standard of law must the defendant’s mens rea be proven to gain a criminal conviction? Must the state prove “what the defendant was thinking at the time of the crime” to prove mens rea? Why or why not?
Actus Reus is when a criminal commits a criminal act or is generally defined as an unlawful bodily movement, mens rea is a criminal intent for example A crime is a violation of a statute of this state in which there is a joint operation of an act or omission to act and intention or criminal negligence (The elements of a crime 2012). To constitute the behavior of criminals, for example if Johnny wanted kill Paul and his intentions was to kill him but he didn’t kill him, then Johnny accidentally left the stove on and it kills Paul then Johnny will not be guilty of murder.